Monday, March 16, 2009

Midwest Region: First Round Preview (and Picks)

Here are my picks for the first round games in the Midwest Region. (As I'm not interested in previewing hypothetical, nonexistent matchups, I won't be providing this level of detail for later round matchups until they're actually set. However, I may post a full bracket prediction with a more summary analysis for each region.)

1-Louisville*
16-Alabama State / Morehead State

I pick Louisville.

8-Ohio State*
9-Siena

Siena’s probably a popular pick after they dismantled Vanderbilt in the first round last year. But I’m not sure how this matchup shakes out for the Saints They like to get their points by attacking the lane, and that’s precisely where OSU’s otherwise-mediocre defense is at its best, with their zone tightening up and BJ Mullens and Dallas Lauderdale swatting shots. OSU is vulnerable to the three-pointer, but that’s not Siena’s game – they neither take a lot of threes nor make a high percentage. The Saints will have to push the transition game to try to get some easy buckets. On the other end, Siena may be able to exploit OSU’s sloppiness with the ball and lack of a solid point guard. But the Saints aren’t a great defensive team in general, and OSU scores a good percentage both inside the arc and out.

On the intangibles front, Siena is, ironically, the more experienced Tournament team. But the Buckeyes will have a nice home-court advantage playing in southwest Ohio. A close call, but I go with OSU.

5-Utah*
12-Arizona

The first thing that leaps out to me about this game is Utah’s 3-point offense and Arizona’s 3-point defense. The Utes shoot a lot of threes, and they make a good percentage lot of threes. Arizona’s defense allows teams to shoot a lot of 3s, and they give up a good percentage on those threes. In fact, 36.3 percent of the point scored against Arizona come from behind the arc – that’s the fifth-highest percentage in the country. This is going to be a problem for the Wildcats, especially in what will likely be a relatively low possession game.

Both teams have been much stronger at home than on the road, so it’ll be interesting to see how they perform a couple thousand miles from home in Miami. This is a popular pick for a 12-5 upset, but I’ll go with Utah.

4-Wake*
13-Cleveland State

Wake Forest is an enigmatic team, sometimes able to beat anyone, sometimes putting up real clunkers. The Demon Deacons’ biggest problem is poor decisionmaking in the halfcourt offense which leads to a lot of turnovers. And guess what Cleveland State does best on defense? Generate turnovers. Their aggressive halfcourt style could cause some problems for Wake Forest. In the end, I think Wake’s size advantage, defense, and ability to get to the free throw line will likely carry the day. Much as I’d like to see an upset here, I think it’s going to tough for the Vikes to pull it off.

3-Kansas*
14-North Dakota State

North Dakota State is underseeded. Since December 1, the Bison have gone 24-4, and their four losses have been by a combined total of 11 points. Two of those losses were to NCAA teams, USC (four-point road loss) and Stephen A. Austin (triple overtime). It’s a senior-laden team that is no stranger to big wins. Three years ago, they won at Wisconsin and two years ago, at Marquette.

But can they beat Kansas? Maybe, but they’ll need to take a lot of threes (which is what Texas Tech did to beat Kansas by almost 20 last week). The Bisons shoot very well from behind the arc (40%) – a place that Kansas doesn’t defend that well – but they don’t typically rely on the three-pointer that much. That will have to change here, because they’re not going to get much going inside.

On the other side of the ball, Kansas is a solid offensive team across the board, with good post players (Aldrich, Morris), a point guard who can beat you inside and out (Collins), slashers (Taylor), and shooters (Reed, Morningstar). And they will beat you in transition to boot. The only thing the Jayhawks have to worry about is sloppiness with the ball, but they’ve held that in check of late. An upset is possible, but given the contrast between Kansas’ high-octane offense and NDSU’s throughly mediocre defense, it’s not very likely.

6-West Virginia*
11-Dayton

In the abstract, I think West Virginia is a much better team, but this is a good matchup for Dayton. The Flyers are a long, athletic team that attacks the basket and feasts on the offensive glass, but doesn’t shoot well. West Virginia has a very good defense, but it’s heavy on ball denial and choking off the 3-point line, which doesn’t respond to Dayton’s strengths. Meanwhile, the Mountaineers don’t rebound the defensive glass that well. The one area where West Virginia’s defensive style might produce dividends is in generating turnovers, as Dayton can be careless with the ball.

On the other end of the floor, West Virginia is an even stronger offensive rebounding team than Dayton, and the Flyers have had gotten dominated on their own glass by similar teams like Xavier. The Mountaineers don’t have the best offense in the country, but it’s been improving, and freshman Devin Ebanks has been blossoming.

Despite the less-than-ideal defensive matchup, I think West Virginia is too good a team, and Bob Huggins too good a coach, for them to lose this game.

7-Boston College
10-USC*

Boston College might deserve the title of “most engimatic team” even more than Wake Forest – they beat UNC and Duke and lost to St. Louis and Harvard. They’ll get the Trojans, a mystery of their own, having swept through the Pac-10 tournament after a middling season, addled by an inability to win away from home.

USC mixes defenses a fair amount. I’m not sure that BC’s offense begs for one look or another. A zone would help contain BC’s dribble penetration and keep them shooting, which they don’t do well, but it would also have BC’s offensive glass-eating forwards licking their chops. Man defense would help with rebounding, but make it harder to contain the drive. At the other end, Demar Derozan is becoming the star he was (unfairly) expected to be all season long. I like USC’s chances of getting to the free throw line and getting second chance points against BC. They’ve had trouble with turnovers, but have generally cut down of late. I’m gonna go with Tim Floyd and the Trojans to continue their fine late-season run.

2-Michigan State*
15-Robert Morris

I’m not terribly impressed with Michigan State this year, but if they can’t get past Robert Morris, their problems are more serious than I thought.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

First (and Second) Round Tipoff Times (and Announce Crews)

UPDATE: Thanks to the fine folks at Awful Announcing, we can now flesh out the information below with second round game times and announce crews. Good news for the March: Gus Johnson will be announcing the Friday/Sunday games, so no conflict with our Philly plans. Rise and Fire! Lead announce team, Jim Nantz and Clark Kellogg, are, of course, sent to Greensboro to cover those super special teams without which college basketball would cease to exist, Duke and UNC.

ESPN is listing tip times for the first round games on Thursday and Friday, though they're not yet on the CBS Sports website. I've reordered them below by game time. We'll post coverage maps and announce crews as soon as we get that information.

Thursday, 3/19

12:20 PM ET - (9) Butler vs. (8) LSU (Jim Nantz, Clark Kellogg)
12:25 PM ET - (15) Cal State Northridge vs. (2) Memphis (Tim Brando, Mike Gminski)
12:30 PM ET - (9) Texas A&M vs. (8) Brigham Young (Carter Blackburn, Jay Bilas)
2:30 PM ET - (12) Northern Iowa vs. (5) Purdue (Kevin Harlan, Dan Bonner)
2:50 PM ET - (16) Radford vs. (1) North Carolina (Nantz, Kellogg)
2:55 PM ET - (10) Maryland vs. (7) California (Brando, Gminski)
3:00 PM ET - (16) Chattanooga vs. (1) Connecticut (Blackburn, Bilas)
5:00 PM ET - (13) Mississippi State vs. (4) Washington (Harlan, Bonner)
7:10 PM ET - (10) Michigan vs. (7) Clemson (Brando, Gminski)
7:10 PM ET - (10) Minnesota vs. (7) Texas (Nantz, Kellogg)
7:20 PM ET - (14) American University vs. (3) Villanova (Dick Enberg, Bilas)
7:25 PM ET - (13) Akron vs. (4) Gonzaga (Harlan, Bonner)
9:40 PM ET - (15) Binghamton vs. (2) Duke (Nantz, Kellogg)
9:40 PM ET - (15) Morgan State vs. (2) Oklahoma (Brando, Gminski)
9:50 PM ET - (11) Virginia Commonwealth vs. (6) UCLA (Enberg, Bilas)
9:55 PM ET - (12) Western Kentucky vs. (5) Illinois (Harlan, Bonner)

Friday, 3/20

12:15 PM ET - (14) Stephen F. Austin vs. (3) Syracuse (Ian Eagle, Jim Spanarkel)
12:25 PM ET - (9) Tennessee vs. (8) Oklahoma State (Verne Lundquist, Bill Raftery)
12:30 PM ET - (14) North Dakota State vs. (3) Kansas (Gus Johnson, Len Elmore)
12:30 PM ET - (11) Utah State vs. (6) Marquette (Craig Bolerjack, Bob Wenzel)
2:45 PM ET - (11) Temple vs. (6) Arizona State (Eagle, Spanarkel)
2:55 PM ET - (16) East Tennessee State vs. (1) Pittsburgh (Lundquist, Raftery)
3:00 PM ET - (11) Dayton vs. (6) West Virginia (Johnson, Elmore)
3:00 PM ET - (14) Cornell vs. (3) Missouri (Bolerjack, Wenzel)
7:10 PM ET - (16) TBA vs. (1) Louisville (Lundquist, Raftery)
7:10 PM ET - (12) Arizona vs. (5) Utah (Eagle, Spanarkel)
7:20 PM ET - (10) USC vs. (7) Boston College (Johnson, Elmore)
7:25 PM ET - (13) Portland State vs. (4) Xavier (Bolerjack, Wenzel)
9:40 PM ET - (9) Siena vs. (8) Ohio State (Lundquist, Raftery)
9:40 PM ET - (13) Cleveland State vs. (4) Wake Forest (Eagle, Spanarkel)
9:50 PM ET - (15) Robert Morris vs. (2) Michigan State (Johnson, Elmore)
9:55 PM ET - (12) Wisconsin vs. (5) Florida State (Bolerjack, Wenzel)

Saturday, 3/21

1:05 PM ET - Villanova/American vs. UCLA/VCU (Enberg, Bilas)
3:20 PM ET - Memphis/Cal St. Northridge vs. California/Maryland (Brando, Gminski)
3:35 PM ET - Connecticut/Chattanooga vs. BYU/Texas A&M (Enberg, Bilas)
5:40 PM ET - Purdue/N. Iowa vs. Washington/Mississippi State (Harlan, Bonner)
5:45 PM ET - North Carolina/Radford vs. LSU/Butler (Nantz, Kellogg)
5:50 PM ET - Oklahoma/Morgan State vs. Clemson/Michigan (Brando, Gminski)
8:00 PM ET - Gonzaga/Akron vs. Illinois/Western Kentucky (Harlan, Bonner)
8:05 PM ET - Duke/Binghamton vs. Texas/Minnesota (Nantz, Kellogg)

Sunday, 3/22

12:10 PM ET-Syracuse/Stephen F. Austin vs. Arizona State/Temple (Eagle, Spanarkel)
2:20 PM ET - Florida State/Wisconsin vs. Xavier/Portland State (Bolerjack, Wenzel)
2:30 PM ET - Kansas/N. Dakota State vs. West Virginia/Dayton (Johnson, Elmore)
2:40 PM ET - Wake Forest/Cleveland State vs. Utah/Arizona (Eagle, Spanarkel)
2:50 PM ET - Oklahoma State/Tennessee vs. Pittsburgh/E. Tennessee State (Lundquist, Raftery)
4:50 PM ET - Missouri/Cornell vs. Marquette/Utah State (Bolerjack, Wenzel)
5:00 PM ET - Michigan State/Robert Morris vs. Boston College/USC (Johnson, Elmore)
5:10 PM ET - Ohio State/Siena vs. Louisville/Alabama State or Morehead State (Lundquist, Raftery)

The State of the Bubble Nation: Post-Mortem

We correctly called 64 of the 65 teams. While we fully expected a photo finish for the last bid, we were surprised that Arizona inched in front, given their atrocious road record and 1-5 finish (two considerations - where and when - that the selection committee supposedly takes into account). Even if you are biased in favor of power conference teams with lots of top 50 wins, Penn State is a better argument. Creighton and St. Mary's also have reason to be upset.

As you'll know from our last Bubble Nation post, we were not surprised to see Wisconsin squeak in as a 12 seed. The lock status accorded them by a lot of commentators was somewhat perplexing.

In any event, the field of 65 is set. The March will be in Philadelphia for first and second round action at the Wachovia Center featuring UConn, BYU, Texas A&M, Chattanooga, Villanova, American, UCLA, and VCU. In the meantime, we will bring you plenty of bracket analysis and commentary. Stay with us for the ride.

Selection Show LIVEBLOGGING

With apologies to the NFL draft and the NBA lottery, the most important single hour of non-competition sports programming is upon us. We'll be liveblogging it right here. Join us as we celebrate Billy Packer's absence and ponder the days until Jim Nantz' similarly glorious demise.

The State of the Bubble Nation: And DOWN the Stretch They Come!

I'm going to simplify this edition of the Bubble Nation by focusing more narrowly on the bids and teams that I think are still genuinely in play. The big news from this weekend was the championship victories for USC, Temple, and Mississippi State, all of whom will now crash the Dance at the expense of two Bubble teams.

Let's start with the math.

At-Large Locks

The following teams are locks for at-large bids. These lists do not include teams that have already captured automatic bids via conference championships.
  • ACC (3): North Carolina, Wake Forest, Florida State, Clemson, Boston College
  • Big East (6): Pitt, UConn, Villanova, Syracuse, West Virginia, Marquette
  • Big Ten (5): Michigan State, Ohio State, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota
  • Big 12 (5): Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M
  • Pac-10 (4): UCLA, Arizona State, Washington, California
  • SEC (2): Tennessee, LSU
  • Mountain West (1): BYU
  • Atlantic-10 (2): Xavier, Dayton
  • Horizon (1): Butler

The Bubble

There are 34 at-large bids and 31 locks listed above. Accordingly, there are 3 at-large bids available. I've identified 7 bubble teams left, listed below.

To evaluate these teams, I’m going to split them into two groups – power conference teams and mid-major teams – and first compare them to the other teams in their group. Using the official “team sheet” that the selection committee uses, I’ve included more top-line data this time to give as granular a snapshot of these teams as I realistically can.

Power Conference Teams (4):

  • Maryland (RPI 55, SOS 21, 4-8 vs. top 50, 4-3 vs. 51-100, 12-2 vs. 100+, 6-6 last 12) -I think that of all these 7 teams, Maryland is the likeliest to win a bid. The biggest reason is the quality of their top 50 wins - 2 against top 5 teams (Michigan State, North Carolina) and 1 against a top 20 team (Wake Forest). None of the other teams on this list compare in terms of the quality of their best wins. Lean IN.


  • Wisconsin (RPI 46, SOS 17, 4-10 vs. top 50, 5-1 vs. 51-100, 9-1 vs. 100+, 7-5 last 12) - The loss to Ohio State Friday and the developments elsewhere have Wisconsin in a very precarious position. Their RPI has plummeted this week. But in addition to the four top 50 wins, they beat Penn State twice, and they have 5 top 51-100 wins, compared to PSU’s 1. They also had an overall much stronger schedule than Penn State. It’ll be hard for the Nittany Lions to leapfrong Wisconsin. That said, I would not be shocked if both teams were left out. Even Odds.


  • Penn State (RPI 71, SOS 92, 6-9 vs. top 50, 1-1 vs. 51-100, 15-1 vs. 100+, 6-6 last 12) – On the plus side is the 6 top 50 wins, including two on the ROAD at Michigan State and Illinois. On the minus side is the very low RPI, the so-so schedule, and the two losses to Wisconsin. The tightness of the Bubble might keep them out. Even Odds.


  • Arizona (RPI 59, SOS 31, 6-10 vs. top 50, 2-2 vs. 51-100, 11-1 vs. 100+, 7-5 last 12) – The more I look at Arizona, the more convinced I am that they will be on the outside looking in. The committee has frequently said they look at your home/road split and how you performed towards the end of the season. Arizona has not defeated a single top 100 RPI team on the road. On top of that, they finished the regular season on a 1-4 skid (because of their inability to win on the road). Despite the big non-conference wins against Kansas and Gonzaga, I think the Wildcats' streak of consecutive Tournament appearances (like the other Wildcats') will be coming to an end. Lean OUT.

Mid-Major Teams (3):

  • Creighton (RPI 41, SOS 111, 2-2 vs. top 50, 8-3 vs. 51-100, 16-2 vs. 100+, 11-1 last 12) – Creighton’s biggest selling point is the very impressive 11-1 mark in the last 12 games. The second biggest selling point is that in addition to the 2 top 50 wins (which both St. Mary’s and SDSU share), they have a whopping 8 wins against teams ranked 51-100. For these reasons and others that I get into more below, I’m ranking Creighton slightly higher than St. Mary’s and SDSU. Even Odds.


  • St. Mary's (RPI 43, SOS 141, 2-3 vs. top 50, 1-1 vs. 51-100, 20-1 vs. 100+, 8-4 last 12) – There is a lot of pressure on the Committee to account for Patty Mills’ injury in evaluating St. Mary’s. The problem is that even if you do, how much stronger is their resume compared to the other teams on this list? They lost 3 games with Mills out – 2 to Gonzaga, 1 to Portland. With Mills in his current condition (which is how they’ll be evaluated), they lost to Gonzaga by 20-plus points. So you can’t say that they would’ve won those 2 games against Gonzaga. Of course, it’s fair to say they would’ve defeated Portland. But that adjusts their resume by exactly one win against a 100+ RPI team. Is that enough? How do their top 50 wins against SDSU and Utah State compare to Creighton’s over Dayton and Illinois State? Pretty much a wash. But Creighton has 8 more solid wins against top 50-100 teams, while St. Mary’s has just one. On the other hand, Creighton has two bad losses, while St. Mary’s would have zero. This is one of the most confounding Bubble cases you will ever see. But at the end of the day, even if you account for Mills’ injury, it’s not clear that St. Mary’s has a stronger argument than Creighton. Even Odds.


  • San Diego State (RPI 35, SOS 47, 2-6 vs. top 50, 4-2 vs. 51-100, 15-1 vs. 100+, 8-4 last 12) - The Aztecs' MWC tournament wins against UNLV and BYU have rejuvenated their at-large chances. The problem is what happens when the committee gets down to comparing the last few teams. First, the Aztecs have lost to two of the other teams on this list (St. Mary's and Arizona). Second, of the other teams on this list, they are probably most comparable to Creighton (St. Mary’s is also a mid-major, but has very unusual circumstances). Both teams have top 2 top 50 wins, but Creighton has a better percentage record against the top 50, double the number of wins against teams 51-100, and a very impressive 11-1 run down the stretch. At the end of the day, SDSU just doesn’t have something that allows them to stand out from this pack (like Creighton’s last 12 record, St. Mary’s’ injury situation, etc.). Lean OUT.

The Bottom Line

I think Maryland is certainly in, given the number and quality of their best wins, two of which came in their last 12 games. And I think Arizona is definitely out because of the home/road record and the 1-5 finish. I’m also ruling out San Diego State because of the comparative problems outlined above.

So that leaves four teams competing for two spots: Wisconsin, Penn State, Creighton, and St. Mary’s. Let's try to eliminate teams from this group by focusing on the head-to-head direct comparisons.

Wisconsin's high SOS, head-to-head wins over Penn State, number of top 50 wins, record against teams 51-100 … it all helps them in a direct comparison against these other three teams. Let’s give them the second bid.

As I explained above, because of the late season ‘what team are you now’ focus, I think Creighton’s resume is (barely) better than St. Mary’s’. So I see this coming down to Penn State and Creighton. It’s very, very difficult to compare these two teams because they come from different kinds of conferences and have different scheduling situations. I’m gonna go with Creighton. At first glance, no team outside the top 70 RPI has won an at-large bid in the last 10 years. Creighton’s overall top 100 record compares favorably with Penn State’s. And the Bluejays’ 11-1 mark down the stretch sticks out.

Having said that, it would not surprise me to see St. Mary’s leapfrog Penn State or Creighton to grab the final slot. The Mills situation is so unusual, and the pressure not to punish the Gaels so large, that I could see the Committee choosing them. Any of these three teams getting in would not surprise me.

But my best guess at the 34 at-large bids we’ll see in about an hour is as follows:

  • ACC (6): North Carolina, Wake Forest, Florida State, Clemson, Boston College, Maryland
  • Big East (6): Pitt, UConn, Villanova, Syracuse, West Virginia, Marquette
  • Big Ten (6): Michigan State, Purdue/Ohio State, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin
  • Big 12 (5): Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas A&M
  • Pac-10 (4): UCLA, Arizona State, Washington, California
  • SEC (2): Tennessee, LSU
  • Mountain West (1): BYU
  • Atlantic-10 (2): Xavier, Dayton
  • Horizon (1): Butler
  • Missouri Valley (1): Creighton

Penn State, St. Mary's, San Diego State, and Arizona the first four out.

Auto Bid Alert (Bid Burglar Edition): MISSISSIPPI STATE


In a tragic result, the atrocious SEC has stolen a third bid to the Dance, with Mississippi State defeating Tennessee in a game that, according to Srinivas and consistent with the quality of the SEC, was notable mostly for the horrendous shot selection. The Bulldogs have just sent a more-deserving Bubble team to the NIT, so that we have the privilege of watching not just 2, but 3 mediocre SEC teams in the Tournament. Suffice to say that this is a disappointing result.

As I will explain shortly in my final State of the Bubble Nation analysis, 7 bubble teams are now competing for just 3 bids.

Auto Bid Alert: UTAH STATE

Utah State has put the finishing touches on a very impressive 30-win season with a victory over Nevada in the WAC championship game. The Aggies will Dance with a highly efficient offense that can score from both inside (Gary Wilkinson) and out (take your pick of three-point shooters). Congrats to Stew Morrill's crew.

Just five auto bids left, the last four of which will be decided tomorrow: Big West (late tonight), Southland, ACC, Big Ten, SEC.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Auto Bid Alert: ALABAMA STATE

The undisputed captain of college basketball's all-name team, seven-footer Chief Kickingstallionsims, and his Alabama State teammates (including less-heralded all-name nominee Ivory White) are headed to the Big Dance. Despite a great conference record of 16-2, the Hornets are due for a 16 seed due to the relatively poor quality of the SWAC, a conference composed of a number historically black colleges.

The State of the Bubble Nation: T-Minus 30 Hours

UPDATE: This has been edited to include USC, whom I mistakenly excluded.

It's tight on this fence since them young dudes are muscling in.

Here's an update on where things stand after Friday's action, where the major developments were: (1) big wins for Maryland, San Diego State, Temple, and Auburn, (2) losses for Virginia Tech, Wisconsin, Penn State, Florida, and South Carolina, and (3) Xavier and Dayton crashing out of the A-10 touranment, which means that either Temple or Duquesne is going to steal an at-large bid.

The Locks

The following teams are locks for at-large bids if they don't win their conference tournaments (listed by conference). This list is unchanged from yesterday.

  • ACC (6): UNC, Duke, Wake Forest, Clemson, Florida State, Boston College
  • Big East (7): Louisville, Pitt, UConn, Villanova, Marquette, West Virginia, Syracuse
  • Big Ten (6): Michigan State, Purdue, Illinois, Ohio State, Michigan, Minnesota

  • Big 12 (6): Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M

  • PAC-10 (4): Washington, UCLA, Arizona State, California
  • SEC (2): LSU, Tennessee
  • Mountain West (2): BYU, Utah
  • Atlantic 10 (2): Xavier, Dayton
  • C-USA (1): Memphis
  • Horizon (1): Butler

The Bubble

There are 34 at-large bids. Assuming that each of the above conference tournaments (except for the Horizon and A-10) is won by one of the 37 locks listed above, 8 will win automatic bids, and 29 will win at-large bids. That leaves 5 at-large bids up for grabs. Who's in contention to grab these remaining 5 bids? I've identified 17 bubble teams, listed below by conference:

ACC (2):

  • Maryland (RPI 51, SOS 30, 4-6 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) - Huge win for the Terps against Wake Forest on Friday. They've still got a so-so RPI, but with wins over Michigan State, North Carolina, and Wake, they look strong. Lean IN.


  • Virginia Tech (RPI 63, SOS 19, 2-9 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) - The Hokies came up just short againts a Lawson-less UNC yesterday. With the low RPI, just two top 50 wins, a pair of bad losses, and a weak record down the stretch, the Hokies look NIT-bound. Lean OUT.

Big East (1):

  • Providence (RPI 65, SOS 49, 2-7 vs. top 50, 0 losses vs RPI 100+) – The 11-point win against lowly Depaul and the 22 point drubbing at the hands of Louisville didn’t help Providence’s chances. The Friars are now on the outside looking in. Lean OUT.

Big Ten (2):

  • Wisconsin (RPI 46, SOS 17, 4-10 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) - The loss to Ohio State yesterday and the developments elsewhere have Wisconsin in a very precarious position. Their RPI has plummeted this week, and their top 50 record is very so-so. Their 7-3 record down the stretch is a boost, but Wisconsin cannot feel safe at all. Lean IN.


  • Penn State (RPI 69, SOS 90, 6-9 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) – Penn State's loss to Purdue, coupled with big wins by Maryland and San Diego state (see above and below) means the Nittany Lions remain squarely on the bubble. They’ve got a low RPI, but 6 wins against RPI top 50 in a power conference. That's usually enough to boost a low RPI team into the Tourney, but what has happened (and will happen) elsewhere on the Bubble might squeeze Penn State out. Even Odds.

Pac-10 (1):

  • Arizona (RPI 58, SOS 29, 6-10 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) – As with Penn State, despite the low RPI, 6 wins against top 50 RPI teams is usually enough to bootstrap your way into the Tournament. Plus Arizona has some very nice wins non-conference wins against Kansas and Gonzaga. The big problem here is the 1-4 regular season finish and the atrocious road record. These are important factors for the selection committee. This thing could go either way. Even Odds.


  • USC (RPI 43, SOS 20, 4-8 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – Two Pac-10 tourney wins over Cal and UCLA, and suddenly USC has played its way onto the Bubble. Despite the pretty good RPI and four top 50 wins, I don't think the Trojans have worked their way into the field yet. They finished the regular season 6-9 and have 3 bad losses. It wouldn't surprise me if they made the field, but absent a win over Arizona State today (in which case they wouldn't need an at-large bid, because they'll get an auto bid), I think they're out.Lean OUT.

SEC (4):

  • Auburn (RPI 57, SOS 68, 2-3 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) - Improbably, with the win over Florida, Auburn is the SEC's last hope for 3 bids. Not very likely, with the lack of any meaningful non-conference wins and just two top 50 wins. If they beat Tennessee today, they might stand a shot. Lean OUT.


  • Florida (RPI 52, SOS 82, 1-5 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) – What rhymes with back-to-back champions? Back-to-back NIT trips! The loss to Auburn yesterday blows the Gators off the Bubble and out. Lean OUT


  • South Carolina (RPI 59, SOS 93, 0-4 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) – My anti-Gamecocks mission was finally vindicated with their loss to Mississippi State yesterday. This lousy resume just got worse. Lean OUT.


  • Kentucky (RPI 79, SOS 62, 2-4 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – Hahahahhahahaha.OUT.

Mountain West (3):

  • San Diego State (RPI 32, SOS 53, 2-5 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) - A very big win by the Aztecs last night against BYU. It was a badly needed top 50 win. With the win against UNLV the day before, the Aztecs have done wonders for their RPI and played themselves into pole position for a bid. Lean IN.


  • New Mexico (RPI 67, SOS 79, 3-5 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – The loss to Wyoming late Thursday probably ended their chances. They had made a strong case with an 8-1 record to close the regular season, including wins against Utah, UNLV, and San Diego State. But the loss to Wyoming reinforces the biggest fear about them – they can’t win away from home. I leave them on here because of the late-season form, but if it were up to me, they’d be definitely NIT-bound. Lean OUT.


  • UNLV (RPI 65, SOS 81, 4-5 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – A devastating loss to San Diego State, their third of the season, probably ended their chances. Despite strong non-con wins against Louisville (on the road) and Arizona and a season sweep of BYU, the 8-8 finish to the season – including losses to TCU and Colorado State – will almost certainly keep them out. Lean OUT.

Atlantic-10 (1):

  • Temple (RPI 34, SOS 47, 2-5 vs. top 50, 4 losses vs. RPI 100+) – Temple got a huge win over Xavier (RPI 15) to keep its at-large hopes alive. Here's the Temple quandary, though - if they beat Duquesne today, they don't need an at-large bid. If they lose, though, that puts a dent in their at-large chances. I'll deal with this peculiar scenario below, but for now, I'm going to list them as: Lean OUT.

West Coast (1):

  • St. Mary's (RPI 42, SOS 140, 2-3 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – St. Mary's beat lowly Eastern Washington last night in a last-minute addition to the schedule designed to show off what Patty Mills can do post-injury. He improved his performance over the WCC tournament, scoring 19 points on 6-of-14 shooting (4-for-9 from 3-pt range), but you have to consider the competition. I still think it's hard to ignore the fact that 3 of their 5 losses came with Mills out of the lineup. But with the way things are breaking on the Bubble, it's starting to look really tough for St. Mary's. Even Odds.

Missouri Valley (1):

  • Creighton (RPI 41, SOS 111, 3-2 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – I devoted one long post to Creighton two days ago. For the reasons stated therein: Even Odds.

WAC (1):

  • Utah State (RPI 23, SOS 135, 1-2 vs. RPI top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) - They will only need an at-large bid IF they win fail to win their conference tournament (their fellow bubble teams will be rooting hard for them). They barely survived New Mexico State last night, but the narrow victory doesn't make them look good. As with Temple, the scenario in which they'd need an at-large bid - a loss in the conference tournament - is the scenario in which they likely don't get one. Precedent isn't on their side. In 2002, they went 25-2 in the regular season, but then lost in their conference tourney, and were denied an at large bid. Close, but I go with: Lean OUT.

The Bottom Line

If the "lean in" teams above - Maryland, Wisconsin, San Diego State - take 3 bids, that leaves just 2 left for the following teams: Penn State, Arizona, St. Mary’s, Creighton, and Temple (if they don't win the conference championship today). This is a really tough decision, and frankly, I have no clue how the Committee might decide it. Later today, I'm going to take a look at some more historical data to see how the Committee might break these kinds of logjams, but my sense is that there's no discernible trend that would provide much guidance. I'm going to go with Penn State and Arizona for now (who I ranked above St. Mary's and Creighton yesterday as well). But I reserve the right to change my analysis in the next 30 hours. So my final count, as of now, is as follows:

  • ACC (7): UNC, Duke, Wake Forest, Clemson, Florida State, Boston College, Maryland
  • Big East (7): Louisville, Pitt, UConn, Villanova, Marquette, West Virginia, Syracuse
  • Big Ten (8): Michigan State, Purdue, Illinois, Ohio State, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Penn State
  • Big 12 (6): Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M
  • PAC-10 (4): Washington, UCLA, Arizona State, California
  • SEC (2): LSU, Tennessee

  • Mountain West (3): BYU, Utah, San Diego State
  • Atlantic 10 (2): Xavier, Dayton
  • C-USA (1): Memphis
  • Horizon (1): Butler

Note: The assumption above that all the above conference tourneys that haven’t been decided will be won by at-large locks is a critical one. If Baylor manages to win the Big 12 or Auburn the SEC or Memphis fails to win C-USA or etc, that last team or two could get squeezed out.

Friday, March 13, 2009

The State of the Bubble(s) Nation, Friday the 13th Edition


After an unbelievably wild Thursday, on the Bubble and off it, it’s time to take stock again.

The Locks

The following teams are locks or near-locks (i.e., the only thing that would keep them out is a crazy scenario involving multiple surprise conference champions) for at-large bids if they don't win their conference tournaments (listed by conference):

  • ACC (6): UNC, Duke, Wake Forest, Clemson, Florida State, Boston College
  • Big East (7): Louisville, Pitt, UConn, Villanova, Marquette, West Virginia, Syracuse
  • Big Ten (6): Michigan State, Purdue, Illinois, Ohio State, Michigan, Minnesota
  • Big 12 (6): Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M
  • PAC-10 (4): Washington, UCLA, Arizona State, California
  • SEC (2): LSU, Tennessee
  • Mountain West (2): BYU, Utah
  • Atlantic 10 (2): Xavier, Dayton
  • C-USA (1): Memphis
  • Horizon (1): Butler

Texas A&M and Cal make the list despite disappointing first-round losses in their respective conference tourneys. Their seeds will take a hit, but they’ll be there.

The Bubble

There are 34 at-large bids. Assuming that each of the above conference tournaments (except the already-decided Horizon) is won by one of the locks listed above, 9 will win automatic bids, and 28 will win at-large bids. That leaves 6 at-large bids up for grabs. Who's in contention to grab these remaining 6 bids? I've identified 17 bubble teams, listed below by conference:

ACC (2):

  • Virginia Tech (RPI 57, SOS 26, 2-8 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) - Virginia Tech beat Miami in an elimination game to stay alive, but that won’t clinch a bid for them. A win against UNC on Friday would lock down a bid, but barring that, they’ll be twisting in the wind come Sunday evening. They will be hurt by their 1-6 regular season finish, even though it was against a brutal schedule, and the one win was a big one against Clemson. But their two big wins (Wake, Clemson) were on the road. The committee has to be impressed by that. Even odds.


  • Maryland (RPI 63, SOS 30, 3-8 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) - Maryland took care of NC State Thursday in a must-win game. If they beat Wake on Friday, they’re probably in, but if they lose, they’re probably out. Even Odds.

Big East (1):

  • Providence (RPI 65, SOS 49, 2-7 vs. top 50, 0 losses vs RPI 100+) – The 11-point win against lowly Depaul and the 22 point drubbing at the hands of Louisville didn’t help Providence’s chances. The Friars are now on the outside looking in. Lean OUT.

Big Ten (2):

  • Wisconsin (RPI 41, SOS 14, 4-9 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) - Wisconsin's RPI has dropped nine spots since Monday despite not playing a game. That shows you that other bubble teams are taking advantage of their opportunities. The Badgers get their chance on Friday, as a win over Ohio State will clinch a bid. Even if they lose, they’ll probably make it, but it will depend on what happens elsewhere. They shouldn’t leave it to chance. Strong lean IN.


  • Penn State (RPI 68, SOS 96, 6-8 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) – After the disappointing loss to Iowa, Penn State took care of business against Indiana. A win against Purdue would definitely get them in, but a loss would leave them teetering on the very edge of the bubble. They’ve got a low RPI, but 6 wins against RPI top 50 in a power conference is usually enough to boost a low RPI team into the Tourney. Even Odds.

Pac-10 (1):

  • Arizona (RPI 56, SOS 27, 6-10 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) – They blew their chance to lock up a bid by losing to Arizona State on Thursday, but that’s hardly a bad loss. As with Penn State, despite the low RPI, 6 wins against top 50 RPI teams is usually enough to bootstrap your way into the Tournament. Plus Arizona has some very nice wins non-conference wins against Kansas and Gonzaga. The big problem here is the 1-4 regular season finish and the atrocious road record. These are important factors for the selection committee. This thing could go either way. Even odds.

SEC (4):

  • Florida (RPI 47, SOS 87, 2-6 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) – Florida stayed alive with a win over Arkansas, but they’re hardly in the clear. A win over a not-completely-terrible Auburn team would help their chances, but still not be enough by itself. Just two top 50 wins is going to be tough to overcome. I think they need to get to the SEC Championship to Dance. Even odds.


  • South Carolina (RPI 50, SOS 90, 1-5 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) – I remain firm in my belief that South Carolina does not deserve to Dance. When your only top 50 win is against fellow bubble denizen Florida, you just don’t have much to crow about. A win against Mississippi State isn’t going to change that. They have to beat LSU in the semis. As I mentioned before, though, I can't shake the feeling that the SEC isn't going to get the punishment they deserve this year. Lean OUT.


  • Auburn (RPI 64, SOS 69, 2-5 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) - Auburn wants to be considered. Fine. Beat Florida and Tennessee, and then we'll talk. Lean OUT.


  • Kentucky (RPI 75, SOS 68, 4-6 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – I’m just too afraid of reverse-jinxing them to take them off the list until it’s official. Seriously, a run to the conference championship could give them 6 top 50 wins and boost their RPI to the point where they’d have an outside shot. Lean OUT.

Mountain West (3):

  • San Diego State (RPI 37, 1-5 vs. top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) - The Aztecs stayed alive and significantly boosted their RPI with the win over UNLV. A win over Utah in the semis would send them through, but if they lose Friday, they’ll be right on the Bubble’s edge. The problem remains just 1 top 50 win. Even Odds.


  • New Mexico (RPI 67, SOS 79, 3-4 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – The loss to Wyoming late Thursday probably ended their chances. They had made a strong case with an 8-1 record to close the regular season, including wins against Utah, UNLV, and San Diego State. But the loss to Wyoming reinforces the biggest fear about them – they can’t win away from home. I leave them on here because of the late-season form, but if it were up to me, they’d be definitely NIT-bound. Lean OUT.


  • UNLV (RPI 66, SOS 81, 4-5 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – A devastating loss to San Diego State, their third of the season, probably ended their chances. Despite strong non-con wins against Louisville (on the road) and Arizona and a season sweep of BYU, the 8-8 finish to the season – including losses to TCU and Colorado State – will almost certainly keep them out. Lean OUT.

Atlantic-10 (1):

  • Temple (RPI 40, SOS 50, 1-5 vs. top 50, 4 losses vs. RPI 100+) – Temple stayed alive with the win over Big 5 rival, St. Joe’s. The RPI is decent (they played a good non-con schedule), but the lack of quality wins and the number of bad losses is a major obstacle. They need to beat Xavier on Friday to have a chance. Lean OUT.

West Coast (1):

  • St. Mary's (RPI 44, SOS 142, 2-3 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – The Gaels remaining the most interesting Bubble case. The drubbing at Gonzaga’s hands in the WCC championship game put a big damper on their at-large hopes. Patty Mills hasn’t been very good since his return. In a feat of scheduling magic, Coach Bennett managed to get a game against Eastern Washington Friday night for one last chance to show the committee what kind of team they can be with Mills. In the end, I feel it’ll be hard to overlook the fact that 4 of their 6 losses came with him sidelined, but this is a really tough call. Even Odds.

Missouri Valley (1):

  • Creighton (RPI 42, SOS 108, 3-2 vs. top 50, 2 losses vs. RPI 100+) – I devoted one long post to Creighton yesterday. For the reasons stated therein: Even Odds.

WAC (1):

  • Utah State (RPI 28, SOS 138, 1-2 vs. RPI top 50, 1 loss vs. RPI 100+) - They will only need an at-large bid IF they win fail to win their conference tournament (their fellow bubble teams will be rooting hard for them). Along with Davidson's loss to Butler, Utah State's loss at St. Mary's may have been the most consequential Bracket Buster result. The event was started precisely to give squads like Utah State an opportunity to prove themselves against other top mid-major squads. But the Aggies blew their chance, losing 74-65 to a Mills-less St. Mary's squad. That, coupled with the generally weak schedule and road losses at Boise State and Nevada late in the year, could have them on the outside looking in. While they have a win over Utah, a really strong RPI, and a gaudy 26-4 record, precedent isn't on their side. In 2002, they went 25-2 in the regular season, but then lost in their conference tourney, and were denied an at large bid. Close, but I go with: Lean OUT.

The Bottom Line

If Wisconsin takes one of the 6 remaining bids, that leaves 5, with the following 8 teams best-positioned (for now) to snatch them up - Virginia Tech, Maryland, Penn State, Arizona, Florida, San Diego State, St. Mary’s, and Creighton (if they don't win their conference championship). If I had to pick right now, I'd take Penn State, Arizona, St. Mary’s, San Diego State, and Creighton. So my final count, as of this morning, is as follows:

  • ACC (6): UNC, Duke, Wake Forest, Clemson, Florida State, Boston College
  • Big East (7): Louisville, Pitt, UConn, Villanova, Marquette, West Virginia, Syracuse
  • Big Ten (8): Michigan State, Purdue, Illinois, Ohio State, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Penn State
  • Big 12 (6): Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M
  • PAC-10 (5): Washington, UCLA, Arizona State, California, Arizona
  • SEC (2): LSU, Tennessee
  • Mountain West (3): BYU, Utah, San Diego State
  • Atlantic 10 (2): Xavier, Dayton
  • C-USA (1): Memphis

  • Horizon (1): Butler
  • West Coast (1): St. Mary's
  • Missouri Valley (1): Creighton

Big caveat: The assumption above that all the above conference tourneys that haven’t been decided will be won by at-large locks is a critical one. If Baylor manages to win the Big 12 or Temple the A-10 or Auburn the SEC or etc, those last few teams (currently Creighton, San Diego State, St. Mary’s) could get squeezed out.

High Five



RIP



Thursday, March 12, 2009

The Hardware Store (ACC and Big East Edition)

I've been meaning to do this since the regular season ended on Sunday, but better late than never. Here are my postseason awards for the Big East and ACC:

ACC

All-Conference Team:

  • Tyler Hansbrough, North Carolina
  • Gerald Henderson, Duke
  • Ty Lawson, North Carolina (Player of the Year)
  • Jack McClinton, Miami
  • Jeff Teague, Wake Forest

Newcomer of the Year: Al-Farouq Aminu, Wake Forest
Coach of the Year: Al Skinner, Boston College

Big East

All-Conference Team:

  • Dejuan Blair, Pittsburgh (Player of the Year)
  • Luke Harangody, Notre Dame
  • Jerel McNeal, Marquette
  • Hasheem Thabeet, Connecticut
  • Terrence Williams, Louisville

Newcomer of the Year: Greg Monroe, Georgetown
Coach of the Year: Jay Wright, Villanova

Notes:

  1. Tyler Hansbrough, though somewhat overrated (or maybe just overexposed), is a very good player. But Ty Lawson is more efficient, more versatile, and more valuable to his team. Rest him up, Roy, you'll need him.

  2. Yes, Florida State outperformed expectations. But expectations were so low because they've horribly underachieved relative to their talent level for years. Leonard Hamilton shouldn't win coach of the year just because he didn't waste this team's talent like he usually does. Al Skinner gets the nod, narrowly over Gary Williams.

  3. Blair, McNeal, and Williams are three of my favorite players in college basketball. Williams is the quintessential, do-everything stat-sheet stuffer, McNeal is a go-to guy on both ends of the court, and Blair's offensive efficiency and rebounding dominance are a thing to behold for a guy who measures 6-7. I haven't always been a Big East proponent, but I am this year.

  4. The Hasheem Hype bothers me just a little. He's offensively so-so, and the reason UConn is a top team is because they are strong at all positions. By comparison, Thabeet's teammates (especially Price and Adrien) don't get as much recognition as they deserve. But on the merits, you can't ignore the way he changes the game defensively.

(Abuse of) Statistics 101

At Bracketology 101, a commenter has marshaled some supposedly relevant historical statistics to argue that Creighton should get an at-large bid. He notes that in the past 10 years, there have been 133 teams in the RPI top 50 who had 25 wins, and all went to the Tournament. Because Creighton has an RPI of 39 (now 40) and 26 wins, the commenter concludes that they should Dance.

At first glance, perhaps this sounds compelling. After all, 133 teams! 10 years! No one with this profile has ever been denied!
In fact, this is a great opportunity to explore the abuse of statistics in sports. Let’s look at why.

(1) To use historical comparisons to assess Creighton's chances, you have to compare Creighton to teams that were in a similar situation. It’s completely meaningless to compare this year’s Creighton to teams that were clear locks and nowhere close to the bubble. But that’s exactly what the commenter does by including all 133 teams with top 50 RPIs and 25 wins. This includes, for example, all of the top 10 RPI teams last year (e.g., Kansas, Memphis, UNC, UCLA). Does the fact that these teams made the Tournament tell you anything about Creighton’s chances this year? Of course not.

To make a meaningful comparison, let’s limit it to the 20 teams ranked from 31 – 50 in the RPI (roughly 10 spots above and below where Creighton’s RPI is right now). Because there are 34 at-large bids total, this tends to be the “bubble range” where the rubber hits the road. If you focus on that range, there are only 18 teams who have won 25 games. The incredibly compelling "133 teams in 10 years" figure starts to lose its allure.

(2) Still, you might think that 18 out of 18 is a pretty solid indicator. If these 18 teams all made it, doesn’t that bode well for Creighton’s chances? Well the problem is that not all 18 of these teams received at-large bids. In fact, only 3 of them did! The other 15 received automatic bids by winning their conference tournaments, so we have no idea whether the Selection Committee would’ve given them an at-large bid or not. So now instead of 133 teams in 10 years, we are down to 3 similarly situated teams in 10 years. Sure, all have made the Tournament, but at this point the sample size is so small that the comparison is not all that meaningful. Still, let’s take a look at these three teams, and see what they tell us about this year’s Creighton team. Here they are (RPI in parentheses):

  • 2006 George Washington (37) - This team had a clearly superior resume to Creighton's. They went 26-1 during the regular season before being upset in the A-10 tournament, had a 3-0 record against top 50 teams and no bad losses. Creighton went 25-6 during this regular season, was 2-2 against top 50 teams, and lost twice to teams ranked above 150 in the RPI. This is not a useful comparison.
  • 2002 Southern Illinois (50) - This is actually a very good comparison. Southern Illinois, another Valley team, finished with the exact record Creighton has now (26-7), had 3 top 50 wins (including one over Indiana that I remembered listening to on the internet), and a handful of bad losses (more than Creighton).
  • 2001 St. Joe’s (35) - This is also a sound comparison. St. Joe’s finished 25-6, had 3 top 50 wins, and a couple of bad losses.

These last two comparisons are actually instructive and bode well for Creighton's chances.

On the other hand, what happens if we adjust the parameters of the commenter’s comparisons ever so slightly? What if we look at top 50 RPI teams that had 24 wins instead of 25? Well that gives us the case of the 2006 Hofstra team that did not make the tournament, despite a higher RPI (30) and a resume that is very similar to Creighton’s now. They were 24-6, 3-2 against the top 50, and had one loss outside the top 100. They also played in a tougher conference, which sent two teams to the tournament, one of whom reached the Final Four. And yet, they were denied.

Consider also the case of the 2006 Missouri State squad, another Valley team, that was ranked 21 in the RPI (!). They played five fewer games than Creighton did this year, so they only won 20, but they had 4 top 50 wins, and not a single loss outside the top 50. And that year’s Valley conference was much tougher, producing four Tourney teams and two Sweet 16 runs. Yet Missouri State wasn't invited to the Dance.

The bottom line here is that historical information can be helpful, but in the case of Creighton, the evidence is limited and mixed. Unfortunately, the commenter’s statistical abuse is just a microcosm of the way in which sports commentators assign predictive value to so-called historical trends without any regard for the relevant variables or sample size.

Bubble Battle Royal

Virginia Tech just violently dropkicked Miami off the Bubble, Minnesota knocked Northwestern out of the ring, and some outside interference from Louisville has left Providence clinging to the apron for dear life.

Translation: Just two hours into the day's action, and here we are:

  • Miami - OUT
  • Northwestern - OUT
  • Minnesota - Likely In
  • Virginia Tech - Alive and kicking
  • Providence - Barely alive